data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40836/40836264c391af15022215f72558d1012eca0ac6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5a4f/f5a4f891883454e721a090fe01c497a00d9b8c1a" alt=""
Q: What's the difference between a trampoline and a Leafs fan?
A: You take off your boots when you jump on a trampoline!
Where 100 seasons of stories and lessons from 24 Stanley Cups meet to form a perspective in the Drive For 25
A little sidetrack here from the daily hockey goings on that do little to affect the course of our lives.
I recently read about this shooting in New York City and it got me upset big time.This is not, as you will read, a rare occurence. It has happened more than once. Why it is allowed to go on is nuts. The police are supposed to protect and serve. How they can unload their weapons without shots fired at them is unfathomable. How they are allowed to get away with it is ridiculous. This is murder in my eyes. Just because an officer wears a badge, it should give no justification for events like these, it's beyond simply fucking up!
New York Times reported on Sunday that 23 year old, Sean Bell, died under a hail of over 50 police bullets after leaving his bachelor party at a strip club in Queens. Apparently, a fender bender involving an undercover police vehicle precipitated the shooting.
Bell was supposed to be married the following day. His family had the sad news of informing the attendees that the wedding was off and a funeral was being arranged. Unthinkable!
An angry crowd later gather to demand why police officers killed an unarmed man on the day of his wedding, firing dozens of shots that also wounded two of the man's friends. Some called for the ouster of the city's police commissioner.
At a vigil and rally the day after 23-year-old Sean Bell was supposed to have married the mother of his two young children, a crowd led by the Rev. Al Sharpton shouted "No justice, no peace."
At one point, the crowd of a few hundred counted off to 50, the number of rounds fired.
"We cannot allow this to continue to happen," Sharpton said at the gathering outside Mary Immaculate Hospital, where one of the wounded men was in critical condition. "We've got to understand that all of us were in that car."
Some in the crowd called for the ouster of Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, yelling "Kelly must go."
The story surely recalls events in February of 1999, when African immigrant Amadou Diallo was brutally killed in a hail of bullets on Wheeler Avenue in the Bronx-Soundview section of New York City. The 4 officers, members of the now-defunct Street Crimes Unit, fired 41 shots at the 23 yr old believing he was pulling a gun when Diallo was in fact reaching for his wallet. 41 shots! Think about it! Why 41 bullets were fired is a question with no good answer.
A national uproar ensued over what was obviouslya case of racial profiling and police brutaility.The four officers were eventually acquitted of any wrongdoing. A $61-million lawsuit filed by the yound man's parents was later settled for $3-million.
A number of artists wrote songs that decried the plight of this young man, one of the most memorable being "American Skin (41 Shots)" by Bruce Springsteen. Springsteen sang, outraging police organisations in New York, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and sections of the media.New York's State Fraternal Order of Police, Bob Lucente, promptly bestowed the 'floating fag' tag upon the singer when he debuted the song live in Atlanta, rhyming the lines "41 shots/Kill a fuckin' cop".
A week later, Springsteen appeared at Madison Square Garden for a sold out 10 date stand and the NYC police department refused to provide him any escort. As he played the song nightly, off duty police hired as garden security, gave Springsteen the finger from the edge of the stage during each performance. Springsteen never relented in performing the song on the remainder of the stand and the tour, going so far as to release it on CD and DVD versions of the "Live in NYC" concerts. For his part, Springsteen adressed the songs controversy by simply stating the track attempts to understand the human dilema involved in the shooting by retelling the events, then placing it's context in the eyes of a mother preparing her son for school, while providing him with a lesson on how to react when approached by police.
If all this leaves you untouched, check your pulse and heart.
41 shots....and we'll take that ride / 'cross this bloody river / to the other side / 41 shots.... cut through the night / you're kneeling over his body in the vestibule / praying for his life
Is it a gun? / Is it a knife? / Is it a wallet? / This is your life
It ain't no secret / No secret my friend
You can get killed just for living in your American skin
41 shots.... Lena gets her son ready for school / she says "on these streets, Charles / you've got to understand the rules / if an officer stops you / promise me, you'll always be polite / that you'll never ever run away / promise Mama you'll keep your hands in sight"
Is it a gun?.... You can get killed just for living in your American skin
Is it a gun? / is it a knife? / is it in your heart / is it in your eyes / It ain't no secret /41 shots... and we'll take that ride / 'cross this bloody river / to the other side / 41 shots... got my boots caked in this mud / we're baptized in these waters / and in each other's blood
Is it a gun? / is it a knife? / is it a wallet? / this is your life
It ain't no secret / no secret my friend
You can get killed just for living in your American skin
1 - Pat Quinn behind the Senators bench.
2 - Tie Domi, who once belonged to the Predators for a day or so, in their mustard jersey - puking!
3 - Saku Koivu, with his head amputated, scoring the winning goal in the SCF.
4 - Bobby Clarke, unsnapping his skull cap, and eating his brain Hannibal Lector style.
5 - Bryan Murray doing a headlong swandive into a sump pump.
6 - Darcy Tucker and Belinda Stronach doing the Wango Tango in the penalty box.
7 - Martin Gerber's head on a block of Swiss cheese, with every sports ball imaginable in the net behind him.
8 - Ken Hitchcock delivering a half eaten Pizza Pizza order.
9 - Bruce Garrioch giving birth to his own head, anally.
10 - Jose Theodore stopping a puck.
There is currently much debate going on in NHL circles having much to do with balanced schedules. Certain teams are citing a desire for less games versus divisional rivals and more games against traditional opponants. Teams are also crying foul over the obscenity of seeing the likes of Sidney Crosby and Alexander Ovechkin in their buildings only every once in three years.
While both those claims need imperative fixes, another blasphemy on hockey is occurring - the senselessness of games on back to back nights!
This travesty robs hockey of it's purest goal - to entertain!
As any professional player will attest, hockey, with it's accents on speed and body contact, is in essense the most physical of sports. Demanding that players reach peak levels on a nightly basis is key to its entertainment value. Having players play two games within 24 hours of each other diminishes the possibility of the spectacle reaching its highest of heights.
Unless you subscribe to the notion that bad hockey creates its own excitement, the idea of back to back games is hardly appealing.
Imagine that you have laid down your hundred bucks while waiting a month to catch a favorite player appearing in your city and he shows up tired and flat from playing the night before. Imagine you finally get a hold of primo seats to catch the hometeam of your choice and they are dying halfway through the contest from having just come off the road 24 hours ago.
This is not selling the game at its very best.
The NHL heads will roll the obligatory travel expense / arena booking / jammed schedule excuse, as usual. I say it's a bunch of narrow thinking refried balony. It's fixable if they want to. The benefits ought to be obvious, especially to businessmen only looking at greenbacks.
Simply put, a better quality game will surely lead to more cheeks in seats.
Proof that back to back games are a detriment to fair play, predictability, and excitement, is not hard to find. Doing reasearch over the last ten games of the current schedule, I found shocking and revealing results.
From November 16th, back to November 6th, an 11 day span, there were 17 instances of teams hitting the ice on consecutive nights. 13 of those, a whopping 83% ended in losses.
Below are the games in question. The result in brackets signify the second of two games whereas non bracket scores are the previous nights result
16th
Fla 5 Mon 1 (Mon L)
Min 7 Nas 6 (Nas L)
15th
Nas 5 CBJ 4
Mon 3 TB 1
13th
Edm 2 Col 1 (Edm W)
12th
STL 5 Edm 3
Ana 3 Min 2 (Min L)
11th
Bos 4 Ott 3 (Ott L)
Buf 5 Phi 4 (Buf W)
Was 3 NYR 1 (NYR L)
Car 6 Pit 2 (Pit L)
NJ 4 Fla 2 (Fla L)
TB 5 Atl 3 (Atl L)
Nas 1 Col 0 (Nas W)
Cal 3 Van 2 (Cal W)
Min 3 LA 2
10th
Edm 4 CBJ 1 (CBJ L)
Ott 6 Pit 3
NYR 4 Atl 2 *
Det 3 Nas 0
Buf 5 Fla 4 *
Chi 3 STL 1 (STL L)
Cal 3 Ana 0 (Ana L)
9th
CBJ 4 STL 2 *
Ana 6 Van 0
8th
Det 3 Edm 0 (Edm L)
7th
Mon 3 Edm 2
Cal 3 Dal 1 (Dal L)
6th
Van 2 Dal 1
Some points to make on these stats.
- Of the four teams who managed wins, three of them ( Cal, Buf, Nas ) are hot and ought to have been expected to win.
- Six of the 13 losing teams lost games they would have normally been favored to win.
- Games marked by asterics note two teams who both played the following night. One is inevitably destined to lose.
- Of the 13 teams losing, 9 currently have .500 or better records.
- Six of the 13 losers, also lost the previous game.
I offer these stats, as the devils's advocate to the argument, to point out that winning teams win, while losing teams continue to lose - theoretically. As these figures make clear, such instances hold true only 50% of the time in back to back games. While close to 20 of the leagues 30 teams are playing what appears to be .500 hockey (thanks in no small part to points awarded for what is essentially losses), these findings would tend to suggest a good many of these losses can be found in situations of back to back games.
The NHL always rhetorics that the number of back to back games evens out per team over a seasons course. A handy spin, but that's hardly the point!
Fans want fairness in the spectacle and the outcome decided by factors having nothing to do with scheduling.
When 83% of these games are lost, the argument makes its own point.
We often decry the athlete who does not give their "all". Little do we understand that many times, giving it everything they have ends 7 minutes into the second period.
"Yes, but they are professionals, and ticket prices being what they are, they should..."
Trust me, even the most finely tuned of physical specimens have limitations. Yes, the Rocket, Gordie, and the Golden Jet were hardly ever flat. Their schedules didn't consist of 82 games either. The time frame reference doesn't hold up anymore, but we have still based our hockey ethics and values on these notions we were raised with.
The thinking must now change to allow our best to be the best on a nightly basis.
Come mid - December, I may crank out this method again, for consistencies sake. I doubt the findings will alter much.
Holy Moly, is this guy stressed or what? Damn good thing Ray Emery came to his rescue tonight and saved his sorry ass for the time being!
I'm not sure of the time referance for this little clip, I just know Murray wasn't in this mood last season. The wall logo's still say Corel Center and not Scotia Bank Place. Not sure if that's relevant or not as certain areas still have the decade old Palladium logo's here and there. At first I assumed it was from last Saturday's Montreal game, owing to the guy wearing the bleu, blanc, rouge, Habs jacket in the background.
I'm thinking Murray would have been in the mood for a fight after that game.
As for the content of this little beauty, it's sad that it isn't more audible. I can make out most of the F-bomb peppered strip tearing despite Murray's split tongued, swallowed Indian whistle voice.
The gist of his rage seems to be that the reporter wrote that Murray could not control his players. What that is in refernce to, who knows?
The dialogue goes something like this.
Murray: "You're telling me I couldn't control my guys?'
Reporter: "No"
Murray: "That's a f*ck*n' cheap shot on your part...you f*ck*n' have the right...you don't have the f*ck*in' right to f*ck*in' cut me up...I haven't done anything like this in my f*ck*n' career...it's f*ck*n' wrong...you're full of sh*t...you yappy f*ck*n' prick..I should..."
Not bad - in 19 seconds there were 7 references to intercourse, 1 to erect male genetalia, and for good measure, one term leaning towards th ereporters diet of excrement.
Tell me he's not pissed!
Somewhere owner Eugene Melnyk is going, "Heads it's Quinn, tails it's Hitchcock!"
(RC-Note: A reader has tied this clip to a Kings-Sens tilt from last December. If you check out the box score, Murray's outburst is more in context. It was a brawling game that had the effect of annoucing to the league that Ottawa would no longer be shoved around. 17 calls totalling 78 minutes were handed out to Ottawa in the 5-1 win. Hasek was pulled late in the game for fear of injury and the usual suspects (Avery, McGratton, etc) combined for 6 majors. Misconducts were parking tickets on this night! The scribe may be Jim Fox who covers the Kings. Apparently he said something on air and Murray disagreed with his claim. Ah...the good old days!)
With Patrick Roy's imminant Hall Of Fame induction, many tributes have poured forth from those associated with his during the course of his extraordinary career. Former Habs coach Jacques Demers and current coach Guy Carbonneau, who remains close friends with the former netminder, had much to say in a variety of Montreal based dailies over the weekend. Guy Lafleur, a likeminded dropper of shocking declarations, weighed in with his take on Roy's Latendresse comments. Perhaps, I'll get around to that at some post down the line.
Carbonneau for his part spoke about the hour drives he and Roy took from their Ile - Bizard homes to the Forum - talking hockey all the while as students of the game. They would analize the evenings oposition, go over strategies, exchange ideas and perspectives, all the way to their dressing room stalls, seated next to each other. Carbonneau made reference to Roy's leadership and noted that as captain he passed many of the goalies thoughts and observations along to team mates. Roy felt that not being able to be captain himself would hinder his ability to get things across.
Demers stated that Roy had a profound impact upon his life and that his performances in the 1993 playoffs allowed his to savour his only Stanley Cup championship. The former coach testified to Roy's leadership abilities by stating that he had the qualities of a virtual captain. Along with players such as Carbonneau, Kirk Muller, and Vincent Damphousse, Roy assumed leadership of the team and guided it to glory.
Roy's biggest asset, Demers said, was the fact that he was never in doubt of his means. His fierce competitiveness and desire to win were second to none, his hatred of losing legendary. Roy aligned himself best with those who treated games in the same manner and motivated those less determined to follow his lead. Those who missed the message risked suffering Roy's wrath and were often pointed out before team mates. Players got in line, fearing Roy's thoughts would go so far as the papers, were he angered enough to spout his feelings.
Demers said Roy prepared himself for every game in the same way, with absolute professionalism and focus. In practices, he never stopped trying to find ways to improve himself. That, Demers noted, had a profound effect on those who were at his side.
In a relationship that was based on a mutual respect, the coach and player never had a single run-in. Upon his hire with the Canadiens, Demers immediatly identified Roy as his go-to guy, his smoothest path to victory. Demers has often dropped Roy's name in with greatsports leaders such as Michael Jordan, Joe Montana, and Wayme Gretzky, all icons who were given every inch of leverage when it came to carrying their teams to destiny.
Demers says Roy's stature among the games greats is not for him to determine. Having watched players of different era's, it remains a task to compare legend to legend.
In regard to his accrimonious parting with the Canadiens organization, Demers is still convinced that this was hardly the way Roy wished to end it. In the coaches personal opinion, he feels that Perhaps Roy had had enough of Montreal, felt the team in decline, and sought a change of scenery. These things may have weighted heavily on the goaltenders mind, during the infamous Red Wings game of December 1995.
Demers suggests that if Roy's storied exit was such a blemish on the Habs organization, there would be no plans inthe works to retire his jersey during the teams 100th anniversary in 2009.
The former coach and player sat side by side during the Habs - Leafs telecast on Saturday on RDS, while Roy fielded questions from different sources. When asked to name an all-star team of players he faced during his career, Roy responded with players motivated by the same win-at-all-costs motto he shared. In goal, Martin Brodeur, the likeliest goalie to break some of his records. On defense, two foes who also played alongside him, Raymond Bourque and Chris Chelios. He chose Lemieux over Gretzky at center, having faced him on more occasions. His choice for wingers, Cam Neely and Michel Goulet, were notorious for picking Roy apart during the playoffs especially.
Roy was asked the difference between winning at both the pro and junior levels, and whether he one day saw himself behind an NHL bench. Roy's answer caught me by surprise, but was testament to his honesty. The goalie turned owner summised that certain coaches are destined to teach youngsters and that others are more equiped to lead the pros. He suggested that his experiences are more aligned with the kids and guiding them.
As for rules in the game he'd like to see changed, Roy did not hesitate to mention the curbing of goalies handling the puck and delay of game / puck over glass catastrophy.
The banter between the parties and Roy was very friendly and reached comedic levels when Demers asked if Roy remembered what line combinations he'd slipped the coach prior to his last game before being fired in '95. When a commentator pointed that there was time for one last question, Demers asked Roy for an exact quote of what he'd told Canadiens then president Ron Corey from behind the bench. Roy, laughed heartily, and passed.
Never a dull moment with Roy, it seems.
My blog is worth $71,217.00.
How much is your blog worth?