Sunday, July 29, 2007

Why Brisebois?

Like many other readers who were as caught off guard by this as I was, when I heard that former Canadiens defenseman Patrice Brisebois and Habs GM Gainey were seen having lunch together, all that came to mind were punchlines.

Could Brisebois be springing for a Happy Meal to thank Bob for enabling him to get out of town, buyout dollars in hand, two years back, freeing him from the pressure filled constraints of playing in hockey's hottest simmering kettle?

Maybe Gainey owed him a prime rib or filet mignon for leaving town without a word to blemish the dressing room ranks, not unlike Craig Rivet?

Is Gainey out to lunch?

Then I thought perhaps Carbonneau needs a new whipping boy to keep the troops in line?

But alas no, the punchlines turned quickly into a sucker punch with word that Brisebois has been offered a skinny one year deal to return to the city that once made him sweat in his mid winter sleeps.

My take on Brisebois has always been that he is a player with above average tools, minus the toolbox. He reminded me of Stephane Richer, forever gifted and distracted from public perceptions. This is a player, if you remember well, who was so stressed inside the CH crest, that Hab docs recommended he take an absense from the team to refresh his focus while nursing some aches and pains.

When his mental vacation took him to Paris, he made matters even worse upon his return. Nothing like a little jetlag to help one relax!

He does speak passionately and eloquently on team matters. He is a proud enough Hab to endure the well deserved wrath he sometimes takes on. But words don't always equal actions.
When it comes to Brisebois, you can sense the wheel is spinning but the hamster is dead. From the neck up!

As a player, Brisebois has been perfunctionary at best. Overpaid and overplayed, he came to be overcriticized as well.

Truth is he was never good enough to deserve being dragged through the mud for being something he never was. Money brought that on as much as his sometimes poor play did.

Brisebois was always capable of a decent breakout pass and possessed other offensive traits as well. Used on the powerplay, he could set up play with a fair amount of skill, but he guarded the blueline with all the confidence and poise of a shellshocked kid in a minefield.

In his own end, he was often an adventure waiting to unfold. In time he learned to reel in his capacity for wanting to do too much and settled into a comfortable game of positioning and simplicity. He played well when he was not being noticed, in other words.

Brisebois would never overcome his trademark "Breeze By" moniker, due to his brutal pivots that tended to auger his ass into the ice anytime a speedy winger would cut outside of him.
Now Gainey is looking into bringing the battlescarred blueliner back, wonky spine and all, as a sixth or seventh deep defenseman. From an hour away, I can actually hear eyes rolling inside heads at La Cage Aux Sports over the prospect of this happening.

Just how would this possibly make any sense, I have asked myself?

Can it simply be about depth? On defense, that is never a bad thing. Is it about veteran leadership and experience? I'd be more confortable with that notion if it were a player other than Brisebois.

Is that contract a two way deal that could see Brisebois starting the year and or playing mainly in Hamilton? That is definitely an interesting option for Gainey to peruse, but why would the veteran seek such a role?

My biggest concern deals with three players I see fitting into the extra defenseman role in Montreal much smoother than Brisebois. The three candidates of choice being Ryan O'Byrne, J.P. Cote, and heck, even longshot Mathieu Biron.

For the betterment of O'Byrne's continued developement, it is essential that he plays as many minutes as possible. He should not and will not be in Montreal simply to assume the 7th spot. Brisebois is the option should O'Byrne not be quite ready for prime time just yet.

Cote's time is now or never. He is riding the fine line between prospect and career minor leaguer at this point in time. I would think he is not a fan of Brisebois today. Cote has to be given an opportunity and an opening now, but Brisebois would close it up.

Also in the mix are the roles played by Mark Streit and Josh Gorges, currently sixth and seventh in D spots. The message to them as well would be negative in light of Brisbois signing.

I see it this way, plain and simple. When and if the Habs win the Cup, Brisebois will no longer be around. The experience a young blueliner would gain this season, would surely factor into a Cup run then moreso than any scraps of icetime given to Brisebois now.

It's a no brainer to me, and trust me, I didn't even use my brain on it in any way - honest!

The most popular thinking, is that Gainey is loading up for a trade, having possibly evaluated Brisebois equal to, or better than say Dandeneault or Bouillon. Should the Canadiens be attempting to aquire a player of certain impact, it may well require a package deal. The Canadiens have the bodies to pull such a deal off and this could be what sets it up.

There is still no official word on the contract buyouts for Jassen Cullimore and Tony Salmeleinen, so the Canadiens would sit at 52 standard player contracts at present if adding Brisebois. It could well be that the buyouts have happened without announcement, or that Gainey is slowly and quietly considering assets at hand.

One cannot shake the feeling that something is brewing. Gainey won't reveal what's up his sleeve other than a hairy arm, so the speculation is about to run rampant.

All we can do now, is question the questions!


Topham said...

I share your feelings on Brisebois. I am utterly puzzled. Let's hope his ego makes him shy from a sub-million dollar contract.habs77

Robert L said...

There has to be something brewing here that will make it all add up. As a stand alone signing, it makes little other sense to me.

I was hoping the next Brisebois blurb would be a retirement press conference.

lainlin2 said...

hi Robert!
Big fan of your blog, keep it up.

As for Brisebois, the only potential possible tiny chance that it makes any sense at all is if Dandeneault is a goner.

Very similar player who would get similar ice-time / duties.

But everytime i think of Brisebois, i can't help but seeing his "non"-reaction on the McLaren on Zednik hit few years back...


Anonymous said...

Great Blog, but you said "There is still no official word on the contract buyouts for Jassen Cullimore and Tony Salmeleinen, so the Canadiens would sit at 52 standard player contracts at present if adding Brisebois" and if you check out
you'll see that both players have in fact been bought out.

Robert L said...

Lainlin2 - Glad to hear you enjoy the blog. It consumes and swallows my life!

I'd forgotten that Brisebois went lame witnessing that hit. He was never the most clued in player, and age won't have done for him what it does for wine.

Everyday that passes that he doesn't sign is a day to rejoice, I think.

Matt - Thanks greatly for that info. I checked the Habs site before posting the initial blog on the subject but I must have overlooked that section of it.

For the record then, without Brisebois, the number is 49 signed.

I appreciate the assist!

Cody said...

You've got a great hockey blog and I enjoy reading it regularly.

I like your writing style and I was wondering if you could do a link, quick review, shoutout, or mention of my website

You and your readers might find it helpful. It provides 100% free services to hockey players who buy hockey equipment online.

Thanks for your time and any way to help me advertise my website is much appreciated!

Keep writing & we'll all keep reading. :-)

Sam L. said...

Enjoying your blog (I was the quick draw commenter in the Young Core post). It's balanced, and that's rare.

Brisebois may be an acquisition for the past. What I mean is that we have a good crop of young talent, but it lacks tradition - something I bet Gainey appreciates. Brisebois is a link to that and is also a player that can also add the offense this team sorely lacks.

I've always viewed Dandenault as a replacement for Brisebois - offense with little defense. However, what Brisebois brings to the table that Dandenault simply can't is the deep pride of wearing the CH. 750K is not much if it adds that value to the team.

I'm with Cody - keep writing, cuz I'm gonna keep reading! :)

Anonymous said...

Nail on the head. My sentiments exactly on brisebois. I just hope he does'nt become a distraction in the dressing room.

Again another decent post.

Norm Szcyrek said...

Robert, that was a great blog. Your work is some of the best for Habs comments.

My only small criticism is with your numbers for the 50 player active roster. I checked the website, and counted only 48 players:

Norm Szcyrek said...

Adam said...

Great article but now is when the nightmare really gets ugly.

It would seem that Breezer is going to be on the second pairing. Yes, you read it correctly the second pairing.

The only explanation is that some sort of neurological disorder has befallen Carboneau. I cannot fathom Breezer getting 2nd pairing minutes.