Showing posts with label Darcy Tucker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Darcy Tucker. Show all posts

Saturday, November 03, 2007

A Habs Fan's Leafs Appreciation Confession



( Robert L Note: I figure the above title is attention grabbing in a sense, but misleading in another, however don't expect this lifelong Canadiens supporter to profess a Leafs Love with what you are about to read. I just thought I'd clear that up right away.)

I appreciate the Toronto Maple Leafs as worthy Montreal Canadiens rivals.

I became a Canadiens fan just prior to the dawn of the 1970's when the NHL was about to become a 14 team league. Reared on Habs lore, myth, and legend by my father via dozens of great tales, I grew up anticipating seeing great battles with the Leafs in my time.

Sadly, such battles never materialized. Since then, such battles have restricted themselves to regular season contests for the most part. There have been only two playoff meetings in my lifetime after I was five years old, when the Leafs last met and defeated the Canadiens in Canada's centennial year of 1967. Both playoff meetings, during the Habs dominating dynasty years of the 1970's, were absent of any drama as the Habs were just too strong for not only the Buds, but for the entirety of the NHL at the time.

Since then, I have been waiting and waiting and waiting for them to meet in the playoffs again, just for the thrill of the experience.



It came within a game of happening in 1993, and I recall being of the opinion then, that it didn't matter which opponant the Habs in waiting would face in the final, be it the long time rival Maple Leafs or the Wayne Gretzky led Los Angeles Kings, I could not lose in wishing for a passionate final.

As we all remember, the Habs on a mission, disposed of those 1993 Kings in a swift five game final to claim their twenty fourth Stanley Cup. In hindsight, I often wish the Leafs would have made it then, as it turned out to be the last time the Canadiens and Maple Leafs could have met under such circumstances, in a Stanley Cup final.

In the mid 1990's, former Habs goaltender turned Leafs president Ken Dryden, convinced the NHL to move the Leafs into a more geographically suitable division, where they can now battle the Habs for a place in the standings through 8 regular season meetings.

Dryden's successful proposal was both a good and bad thing, as it increased the chances of both teams meeting in a playoff round, while eliminating the possibility that they can meet in a battle for Lord Stanley's mug.

Admittedly, since that realignment, neither team has shown the goods to get to the final. It is now a further farfetched notion that either team could have their act together coincidently in the same season, to even make such a scenario possible. The best both teams could achieve would be a meeting in a conference final, which isn't quite the same for older fans.



Put me down as one fan who disagrees with conference based playoffs, as it eliminates so many great rivalry possibilities and the Habs and Leafs chances of meeting each other to play for the Cup. It wipes out not only their prospective meeting for all the marbles, but it has in the past deprived hockey fans of seeing the Red Wings and Avalanche, for but one example, beat each other down for the right to inscribe their names on the Holy Grail of hockey silverware.

All hockey fans lose with this narrow setup.

Getting back to present reality with the Leafs and Habs, no one team has quite dominated the other in the last ten years, and that is probably the way it should be, because what is the sense of a one sided rivarly?

There is always a great anticipation of drama in even the most inconsequencial of matchups between Toronto and Montreal.

Two seasons ago, the Canadiens virtually knocked the Leafs out of the playoffs, with back to back trashings too late in the season for the Leafs to recover. Last season, the Leafs returned the favor in what could be billed as the strangest game ever played.

As of this writing, the Canadiens and Maple Leafs seem to be heading in opposite directions. The Leafs are a club mired in identity and discipline crisises while the Habs stand third overall in the NHL (albeit fourth in their conference due to divisional leader seedings), with only Ottawa and Detroit having more points.

Plainly stated, the Habs are exceeding most expectations while the Leafs are likely still trying to figure out their Jekyl and Hyde natured team.



Over the past few seasons, the Habs have sturdied their lineup by drafting smartly and grooming their prospects patiently while awaiting results. The plan seems to be paying off.

In Toronto, there is no such plan in place, as the salary capped out Leafs must battle with the production from high priced free agents that have so far failed to make the team appear as the contenders their GM John Ferguson pertains them to be. The youth waiting in the wings of the Leafs organization is nothing to speak of.

With all history considered, recent and bygone, this is where both organizations stand in regards to each other right now.

Appropriately, it also brings me to my present Habs fan relationship with the Maple Leafs, and it is a contradictory one.

When I look at standings and see that Toronto, as well as our Habs are both in the playoff picture, I envision (salivate is too strong a word) that a playoff meeting is in the cards.
When I check scoreboard finals involving the Leafs, one part of me shudders, another cheers, when they win.

The same thing, oddly, happens when they lose.

I could never quite explain this odd sensation, and it took a quote from Ken Dryden, upon his jersey number retirement at the Bell Centre last season, to give me some perspective into the paradox of how I felt.



Dryden, when asked about differences between the Canadiens and Leafs in theory, explained that from his perspective, both teams resembled each other more than each team's fans would care to admit. He did mention that the fans of both were virtually identical in passion. He did not theorize beyond that, unfortunately.

I'd be lying if I didn't agree.

The former Habs goalie never did delve into the french - english, or Ontario - Quebec dynamic of the question, but rather settled his opinion on the fact that both teams had histories, up to a point, that greatly compared to each other.

I imagine that point to be 1967.

For myself, that meant trying to percieve the Habs in a 40 year Stanley Cup drought, trying to find their way home.

It quickly put me in a Maple Leafs fan's shoes.

It helped me to recognize just what it is that I like, and don't like, about the Maple Leafs, fans notwithstanding.

For starters, the Leafs bring the same passion to big games as do our Habs. While that dedication tends to swing and sway throughout a season's course, it revives whenever they meet the Canadiens - making for many memorable games.



I like the odd Leafs player, when imagining them in a Habs jersey.

Mats Sundin would surely be a better Canadien than a Maple Leaf, purely on a historical perogative. With Mats reminded of Stanley Cups at every turn, how could he not be more primed than he is in a city that tolerates his nights off.

Tomas Kaberle is in many ways an equal talent package to Andrei Markov. While he may be surrounded by less than stellar cohorts on the Toronto defense, he has often shown himself to be a big game player, especially against us.

Both Darcy Tucker and Chad Kilger are former Habs that I wish had never left. If Tucker could focus more on the final score, minus his sideshow antics, he'd be a welcome Habs player once more. Habs fans tend to hate him for his behavioral extremities, but like Claude Lemieux once upon a time, when he reels in his idiocies and sticks to hockey, he can become quite the gamebreaker.

Kilger, with his size and skating, can also make a difference. During the Habs identity crisis years in the early 2000's, Kilger was an all too brief breath of fresh air. After injuries took him off the Habs roster, he alternated between flashes of greatness and ghostlike disappearance. He's a Maple Leaf now because of those inconsistancies. I'm biased, though, in Kilger's case, he's from my hometown, and remains a very likeable off ice fellow.



Beyond these four, no Leafs player truly makes me jealous or envyous.

In recognition of historical matters, I was very interested last season when the Leafs chose to finally honour the 1967 team with a ceremony noting the landmark Cup win. In consequence, I was extremely put off when the Leafs organization failed to include the Stanley Cup in the evenings dealings.

It made ridicule even simpler.

I have many friends and aquaintences that are Leafs die hards, and I can rarely get them to speak of their individual and personal pains in regards to the Leafs perenial hopelessness. While they are quick as lightening to slander Montreal in every way, they are often at a loss to explain exactly why, or where the Leafs seem headed.



Me being who I am to them, I'd guess that they do not want to enter such a discussion. They have an almost scripted venom for Senators fans, but little to put forth to me in terms of prolonged arguments or queries.

It's not really the way it should be in a spirited rivalry.

Perhaps it is just the void in my father's reminiscing that makes me long for certain special meetings between the two teams. I do not know any other way to explain my longing that secretly makes me quietly cheer for Leaf success on par with that of the Habs.

One thing is for certain though, when it comes to the Leafs against the Habs, I will enjoy hating them as I relish in mocking them for the better part of the next twenty four hours.

Beyond this regular season's end, I'll likely be mad at the Leafs once more for spoiling what could have been one hell of a party.

But I've gotten use to it, and that's just plain sad.

Sunday, August 05, 2007

Team Current Habs Versus Team Former Habs

























So this post originated via an argument with know-nothing Leaf fan #1967....

The quote from my blue and white bud brained aquaintance that set my blood to boil was...."The Canadiens ( pronounced Canadee N's - like they all do!) have probably traded away a team worthy of winning the Cup!"

Riiiiiiight!

Knowing that very few former Habs have left the team to go on and win the Stanley Cup with other squads, a notion was born in my head to compare ex - Habs to today's current team to see how one lineup would measure against the other. I'll get to that shortly. Scroll down past this conversation to get to those comparisons if you wish.

This battle of wits with an unarmed, card carrying Leaf nation member, started out as a verbal joist over which of our teams finished best in 2006-07.

He exclamed "Touche!" upon the meaningless fact that the Leafs finished 9th and the Canadiens were 10th, before I could mention that both teams failed to make the playoffs.

"So take your little extra point in the standings and shine it proudly. What does it give you?"
"Bragging rights!", he states, undaunted.

"Bragging rights to what?" I demanded. "The Habs have won 10 Stanley Cups since the Leafs last won it in '67. Still wanna talk about bragging rights?"


















"That's all yesterday", he summised, "It don't matter, the Leafs are Canada's team."

"So we're a nation of losers, right? Like all those Cup wins by Montreal have gained them no allegiances across the country over the years, I suppose?"

"Nope", he defends without a point. "Toronto is the country's biggest city, English is Canada's official language."

"We have two official language my friend, wake up!"

"Well I never heard of Habitants Nation!"

"Leaf Nation is a title Leafs fans have given themselves, buddy. It's for all intents and purposes inexistant. It's a slogan for Christsakes, it doesn't represent a country."

"Still we are Canada's team!"




















"Can you break a twenty for me?", I ask.

"Yup, two fives and a ten, good?"

"Flip that five dollar bill over, will you?"

"Yeah, so what?"

"See those kids playing pond hockey there?" I ask him.

" Yes, Canada's game, man!"

"That kid with number 9 on the jersey, that ain't Lanny McDonald, you know!"

"I know, but Lanny was one of the greatest Leafs ever, never shoulda been traded!", says Leaf Nation man.

"Probably not, but you're missing my point. A Hab, Rocket Richard, an icon, is on the Canadian currency!"

"It could be Lanny! Even if he was traded to Calgary. The Habs traded great players away too, like Patrick Roy. Alot of people probably think that's Lanny on the five dollar bill...who knows?"

"I doubt it!"

This is where Leaf fan states that the Habs traded away a slew of players whose names graced the Stanley Cup. I challenge him to name one other than Roy and he couldn't. I threw in Chris Chelios, Francois Beauchemin, and Jassen Cullimore.

I added that Lanny McDonald was not traded to Calgary, but was dealt to the Colorado Rockies for a player who ended up wearing number 99. This perplexed him totally. I reminded him of Wilf Paiement, who he faintly recalled.

"So what!", he counterded, "could still be Lanny on that bill!"

"Canada's team ain't the Leafs dude! Lanny wore number 7with Toronto!"

"Whatever!"

With that he turns to the elderly lady sitting next to him and asks a question about her husbands prostate cancer.

While I pull pen and pad from my pocket, scribbling madly, I remind myself some things in life are more important than hockey. I start jotting down former Habs regardless.

Once home, I research NHL.com and find 33 former Montreal Canadiens, amongst the players of 29 NHL teams. I choose the best 22 and line them up against the Canadiens current roster.

I doubt the lineup of former Habs would win a Cup, taken together as a team.














Judge these lineups for yourselves. I find that the current Canadiens have a slight goaltending edge, and more upside and depth at forward. The bottom half of former Habs defensemen is favorable over the current Canadiens blueliners.

I have noted with asterisks, players who have departed during the Bob Gainey regime. This could be used to rate Gainey's four years of work as Habs GM - see it as you wish. The numbers in brackets are the players salaries in million dollar decimals. The former Habs cap out at 55.5 million.

You be the judge here. Which lineup would you prefer over the next few seasons?

Cristobal Huet / Tomas Vokoun - Florida (5.7)
Price or Halak / Jose Theodore* - Colorado (5.3)
Andrei Markov / Mathieu Schneider - Anaheim (5.6)
Roman Hamrlik / Sheldon Souray* - Edmonton (5.4)
Mike Komisarek / Francois Beauchemin* - Anaheim (1.7)
Mathieu Dandeneault / Chris Chelios - Detroit (0.9)
Mark Streit / Craig Rivet* - San Jose (3.5)
Francis Bouillon / Stephane Robidas - Dallas (1.5)
Patrice Brisebois / Ron Hainsey* - Columbus (0.7)

























Saku Koivu / Mike Ribeiro* - Dallas (2.8)
Michael Ryder / Darcy Tucker - Toronto (3.0)
Alex Kovalev / Sergei Samsonov* - Chicago (3.5)
Tomas Plekanec / Dainus Zubrus - New Jersey (3.4)
Chris Higgins / Mark Recchi - Pittsburgh (2.0)
Andrei Kostitsyn / Marcel Hossa* - Rangers (0.8)
Bryan Smolinski / Radek Bonk* - Nashville (1.5)
Guillaume Latendresse / Richard Zednik* - Florida (1.6)
Steve Begin / Chad Kilger* - Toronto (0.9)
Maxim Lapierre / Yannick Perreault* - Chicago (1.5)
Tom Kostopoulos / Craig Conroy - Calgary (2.4)
Kyle Chipchura / Jason Ward* - Tampa (0.7)
Garth Murray / Donald Brashear - Washington (1.1)

Other former Habs not included in this lineup are defensemen Brett Clark of Colorado, Sean Hill of Minnesota, and Alain Nasreddine of Pittsburgh. Former Habs goalies are Mathieu Garon* of Edmonton, Jocelyn Thibault of Buffalo, and David Aebischer* of Phoenix. Forwards Raitis Ivanans* of Los Angeles and Scott Thornton of Los Angeles, round out the group.

Unsigned former Habs also include Mike Johnson*, Jan Bulis*, and Trevor Linden.

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Koivu Shoots For 500


With one more goal or assist, Saku Koivu will reach the 500-point milestone he surely should have passed long ago.

With his skill and battling attitude on the ice, who knows how many points the Montreal Canadiens captain might have piled up in his 11 NHL seasons had his career not been beset by injuries and a battle with a cancer?
Certainly a lot more than the 499 - 152 goals and 347 assists in 608 games - he takes into a game Thursday night against the Capitals in Washington.

Not that Koivu loses any sleep over the 244 games he has lost to injury and illness in his career.

"That's all in the past," Koivu said Wednesday. "I want to set new goals.Whatever happened, happened. Now I'm enjoying hockey and my life and there's no reason to look back."

Koivu was drafted 21st overall in 1993 and has done comparatively well against that years draft class considering the injuries and the fact he remained in Finland until 1995. Only two players chosen before Koivu have surpassed his point totals and both have appeared in an additional 200 games. Paul Kariya with 831 and Jason Arnott with 667, lead the group that included the highly touted Alexandre Daigle. Other norables taken that year include Todd Bertuzzi and Darcy Tucker, 151st by the Canadiens.

This season, Koivu has been on a point per game pace - 15 goals and 24 assists in 39 contests - and is set to beat his career best totals from 2003, 21 goals and 71 points.

That is despite off-season surgery to repair a detached retina in his left eye from being clipped under the visor by Justin Williams stick during a playoff game against Carolina last spring. Koivu was left with a blind spot and a small cataract that is to be removed after the season. He said it hasn't interfered with his performance.

"It hasn't got better or worse, but now, when I lose the puck, I don't think about it," he said. "The cataract bothers me more than anything, but we can fix that after the season."

Koivu hasn't missed a game this season, and has been injury-free for most of the three seasons since his bout with cancer, which he credits mostly to better training methods.

It hasn't always been so.

He was leading the NHL in scoring in his sophomore season when he suffered his first major knee injury in December 1996 and missed 32 games, ending the season with 56 points in 50 games.

Shoulder and knee injuries limited him to 24 games in 1999-2000, the year he was named captain. More injuries held him to only 54 games the following season, but the worst was still to come.

En route to training camp before the 2001-02 campaign, Koivu fell ill with what was later diagnosed as non-Hodgkins lymphoma, a type of cancer of the abdomen.

After a hellish season of treatment, Koivu returned for the final three regular season games and tied for the team lead in playoff scoring as he led Montreal into the second round. That earned him the Bill Masterton Trophy for perseverance, dedication and sportsmanship.

Now 32 and healthy, Koivu centres Montreal's top line and is scoring more than ever.

Coach Guy Carbonneau said his worth is judged by more than career point totals.

"He came through a lot with cancer and injuries, but he has a passion for the game, the city and the team and it shows in his play."

Along with his NHL achievements, Koivu has also shone in international play. He was captain of a Finnish team that won silver at the 2006 Winter Olympics, to go with bronze medals in 1994 and 1998. He also led Finland to gold at the 1995 world championships and silver at World Cups in 1996 and 2004.

Just as his injury in the playoffs sank any hopes an upset of the eventual Stanley Cup champion Hurricanes last spring, his presence has had much to do with the Canadiens' 23-11-5 start this season.

And later this month, he is to undergo his fifth annual test for cancer - the one that should show whether the disease has been beaten for good.

It will be taken on a CT/PET scan machine at Montreal General Hospital that he helped pay for by setting up the Saku Koivu Foundation in 2002, which raised $2.5 million toward its $8 million price tag.

Koivu seems as proud of that as he does of his 499 points, with one more to go to for that nice round 500.

"Sometimes you don't realize you're getting close to milestones," he said. "But I'd like to get it over with sooner rather than later.

"Hopefully, it will come Thursday night."