Showing posts with label 1967 Toronto Maple Leafs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1967 Toronto Maple Leafs. Show all posts

Saturday, November 03, 2007

A Habs Fan's Leafs Appreciation Confession



( Robert L Note: I figure the above title is attention grabbing in a sense, but misleading in another, however don't expect this lifelong Canadiens supporter to profess a Leafs Love with what you are about to read. I just thought I'd clear that up right away.)

I appreciate the Toronto Maple Leafs as worthy Montreal Canadiens rivals.

I became a Canadiens fan just prior to the dawn of the 1970's when the NHL was about to become a 14 team league. Reared on Habs lore, myth, and legend by my father via dozens of great tales, I grew up anticipating seeing great battles with the Leafs in my time.

Sadly, such battles never materialized. Since then, such battles have restricted themselves to regular season contests for the most part. There have been only two playoff meetings in my lifetime after I was five years old, when the Leafs last met and defeated the Canadiens in Canada's centennial year of 1967. Both playoff meetings, during the Habs dominating dynasty years of the 1970's, were absent of any drama as the Habs were just too strong for not only the Buds, but for the entirety of the NHL at the time.

Since then, I have been waiting and waiting and waiting for them to meet in the playoffs again, just for the thrill of the experience.



It came within a game of happening in 1993, and I recall being of the opinion then, that it didn't matter which opponant the Habs in waiting would face in the final, be it the long time rival Maple Leafs or the Wayne Gretzky led Los Angeles Kings, I could not lose in wishing for a passionate final.

As we all remember, the Habs on a mission, disposed of those 1993 Kings in a swift five game final to claim their twenty fourth Stanley Cup. In hindsight, I often wish the Leafs would have made it then, as it turned out to be the last time the Canadiens and Maple Leafs could have met under such circumstances, in a Stanley Cup final.

In the mid 1990's, former Habs goaltender turned Leafs president Ken Dryden, convinced the NHL to move the Leafs into a more geographically suitable division, where they can now battle the Habs for a place in the standings through 8 regular season meetings.

Dryden's successful proposal was both a good and bad thing, as it increased the chances of both teams meeting in a playoff round, while eliminating the possibility that they can meet in a battle for Lord Stanley's mug.

Admittedly, since that realignment, neither team has shown the goods to get to the final. It is now a further farfetched notion that either team could have their act together coincidently in the same season, to even make such a scenario possible. The best both teams could achieve would be a meeting in a conference final, which isn't quite the same for older fans.



Put me down as one fan who disagrees with conference based playoffs, as it eliminates so many great rivalry possibilities and the Habs and Leafs chances of meeting each other to play for the Cup. It wipes out not only their prospective meeting for all the marbles, but it has in the past deprived hockey fans of seeing the Red Wings and Avalanche, for but one example, beat each other down for the right to inscribe their names on the Holy Grail of hockey silverware.

All hockey fans lose with this narrow setup.

Getting back to present reality with the Leafs and Habs, no one team has quite dominated the other in the last ten years, and that is probably the way it should be, because what is the sense of a one sided rivarly?

There is always a great anticipation of drama in even the most inconsequencial of matchups between Toronto and Montreal.

Two seasons ago, the Canadiens virtually knocked the Leafs out of the playoffs, with back to back trashings too late in the season for the Leafs to recover. Last season, the Leafs returned the favor in what could be billed as the strangest game ever played.

As of this writing, the Canadiens and Maple Leafs seem to be heading in opposite directions. The Leafs are a club mired in identity and discipline crisises while the Habs stand third overall in the NHL (albeit fourth in their conference due to divisional leader seedings), with only Ottawa and Detroit having more points.

Plainly stated, the Habs are exceeding most expectations while the Leafs are likely still trying to figure out their Jekyl and Hyde natured team.



Over the past few seasons, the Habs have sturdied their lineup by drafting smartly and grooming their prospects patiently while awaiting results. The plan seems to be paying off.

In Toronto, there is no such plan in place, as the salary capped out Leafs must battle with the production from high priced free agents that have so far failed to make the team appear as the contenders their GM John Ferguson pertains them to be. The youth waiting in the wings of the Leafs organization is nothing to speak of.

With all history considered, recent and bygone, this is where both organizations stand in regards to each other right now.

Appropriately, it also brings me to my present Habs fan relationship with the Maple Leafs, and it is a contradictory one.

When I look at standings and see that Toronto, as well as our Habs are both in the playoff picture, I envision (salivate is too strong a word) that a playoff meeting is in the cards.
When I check scoreboard finals involving the Leafs, one part of me shudders, another cheers, when they win.

The same thing, oddly, happens when they lose.

I could never quite explain this odd sensation, and it took a quote from Ken Dryden, upon his jersey number retirement at the Bell Centre last season, to give me some perspective into the paradox of how I felt.



Dryden, when asked about differences between the Canadiens and Leafs in theory, explained that from his perspective, both teams resembled each other more than each team's fans would care to admit. He did mention that the fans of both were virtually identical in passion. He did not theorize beyond that, unfortunately.

I'd be lying if I didn't agree.

The former Habs goalie never did delve into the french - english, or Ontario - Quebec dynamic of the question, but rather settled his opinion on the fact that both teams had histories, up to a point, that greatly compared to each other.

I imagine that point to be 1967.

For myself, that meant trying to percieve the Habs in a 40 year Stanley Cup drought, trying to find their way home.

It quickly put me in a Maple Leafs fan's shoes.

It helped me to recognize just what it is that I like, and don't like, about the Maple Leafs, fans notwithstanding.

For starters, the Leafs bring the same passion to big games as do our Habs. While that dedication tends to swing and sway throughout a season's course, it revives whenever they meet the Canadiens - making for many memorable games.



I like the odd Leafs player, when imagining them in a Habs jersey.

Mats Sundin would surely be a better Canadien than a Maple Leaf, purely on a historical perogative. With Mats reminded of Stanley Cups at every turn, how could he not be more primed than he is in a city that tolerates his nights off.

Tomas Kaberle is in many ways an equal talent package to Andrei Markov. While he may be surrounded by less than stellar cohorts on the Toronto defense, he has often shown himself to be a big game player, especially against us.

Both Darcy Tucker and Chad Kilger are former Habs that I wish had never left. If Tucker could focus more on the final score, minus his sideshow antics, he'd be a welcome Habs player once more. Habs fans tend to hate him for his behavioral extremities, but like Claude Lemieux once upon a time, when he reels in his idiocies and sticks to hockey, he can become quite the gamebreaker.

Kilger, with his size and skating, can also make a difference. During the Habs identity crisis years in the early 2000's, Kilger was an all too brief breath of fresh air. After injuries took him off the Habs roster, he alternated between flashes of greatness and ghostlike disappearance. He's a Maple Leaf now because of those inconsistancies. I'm biased, though, in Kilger's case, he's from my hometown, and remains a very likeable off ice fellow.



Beyond these four, no Leafs player truly makes me jealous or envyous.

In recognition of historical matters, I was very interested last season when the Leafs chose to finally honour the 1967 team with a ceremony noting the landmark Cup win. In consequence, I was extremely put off when the Leafs organization failed to include the Stanley Cup in the evenings dealings.

It made ridicule even simpler.

I have many friends and aquaintences that are Leafs die hards, and I can rarely get them to speak of their individual and personal pains in regards to the Leafs perenial hopelessness. While they are quick as lightening to slander Montreal in every way, they are often at a loss to explain exactly why, or where the Leafs seem headed.



Me being who I am to them, I'd guess that they do not want to enter such a discussion. They have an almost scripted venom for Senators fans, but little to put forth to me in terms of prolonged arguments or queries.

It's not really the way it should be in a spirited rivalry.

Perhaps it is just the void in my father's reminiscing that makes me long for certain special meetings between the two teams. I do not know any other way to explain my longing that secretly makes me quietly cheer for Leaf success on par with that of the Habs.

One thing is for certain though, when it comes to the Leafs against the Habs, I will enjoy hating them as I relish in mocking them for the better part of the next twenty four hours.

Beyond this regular season's end, I'll likely be mad at the Leafs once more for spoiling what could have been one hell of a party.

But I've gotten use to it, and that's just plain sad.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Did Stemkowski Butt Out "67 Habs?

(Note - I found this great, hilarious, and mythical piece at NHL.com from writer Evan Welner.)

Everyone knows who scored the Stanley Cup game-winning goal. It's pretty easy to pick out. Someone shoots and he either scores or the goaltender makes the stop and someone puts in the rebound. It’s cut and dry.

But just who really did score the goal to give the Toronto Lord Stanley's Cup back on May 2, 1967?

Toronto won the game, beating Montreal 3-1 with Jim Pappin being credited with the game-deciding tally at the 19:24 of the second period. George Armstrong scored an empty-net tally with 47 seconds left to clinch the Cup. But did Pappin really score the goal? Or did someone else net the clincher in Game 6?

Video replays show Pappin's shot was deflected, hitting Pete Stemkowski in what appears to be the derriere. Stemkowski always thought he felt something hit him in front of the net, but no one bothered to check TV replays back in 1967. Besides, the puck did go into the net and the Maple Leafs held off the Canadiens to win the Cup.

Pappin and Stemkowski will have the chance to replay the goal again Saturday as the 1967 Leafs will be honored during pre-game ceremonies at the Edmonton-Toronto game at the ACC. Another reunion will take place March 22 at a dinner at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre to benefit the Make-A-Wish Foundation.

"I think I scored the goal, but I don't know whether I scored the goal," Stemkowski recalled. "At the time that the goal was scored, they said I scored the goal. But I have seen the replay since ... years later ... they didn't have replays or things like that then.

"I still don't know whether I scored the goal. It was a crazy thing. Jim Pappin shot the puck from in front of the net. Terry Harper and myself were standing (in front of the net) and it hit something and went into the net."

Here's where the story gets really murkier. It seems that Pappin had a lot riding on the goal.

"I could have taken credit for that goal, because it was not obvious who scored it and had the winning goal in the Stanley Cup game," Stemkowski said. "The fella who scored the goal, Jimmy Pappin, came up to me after and said 'Hey listen, I got a big, big bonus riding on this. Did you really touch that puck?' I said, 'I felt something, I felt something Jimmy.' And he said, 'Well look between you and I just say you didn't feel a darn thing.' So I went over to the referee and said 'Well I don't think I really touched that puck.'

"Jim Pappin got credit for that goal, got a $10,000 bonus and put a swimming pool in his backyard, and you know what? The guy was real generous. He let me swim in that pool anytime I wanted the rest of the summer.

So that was my reward for scoring a goal that I didn't score."

Stemkowski has never gotten to the bottom of just how that puck ended up in the Canadiens net. He looked for a bruise on his body as a sign the puck hit him, but there was no bruise or black and blue mark. Then he bought the video copy of the 1967 Stanley Cup Final looking for evidence. But there was no answer there, at least in his mind.

"They advertised the video tapes of the 1966-67 Stanley Cup and out of the blue I said I'll get out my Visa card and get this darn thing and maybe it will show it. And I have gone over that tape time and time again. I have had friends look at that thing, slow it down and everything and its still not conclusive as to who scored that goal," said Stemkowski. "I could have been a real unfriendly teammate in that situation and been in the record books in the NHL scoring the winning goal in the Stanley Cup. But I don't even know whether or not I even got an assist on the Stanley Cup winning goal."

But there is more to Stemkowski and the Game Six goal saga. Pappin built his pool, but Stemkwoski ran into a problem with his swimming rights.

"I got to swim in Jimmy Pappin's pool. Wasn't that wonderful? He was real nice to me," Stemkwoski joked. "You know he got traded next year, so I got one summer of enjoyment in Jimmy Pappin's pool. He sold the house and the pool with it, so that was my reward for being a nice guy."

The new owners of Pappin's house and pool didn’t seem to care that Stemkwoski had perpetual swimming rights. He never went to the Toronto neighborhood again.

"The house was next to Bob Pulford's house. He was such a grouch; he never put a smile on his face. So it wasn't exactly the friendliest neighborhood. Pappin and Pulford, who played on my two sides, these were two that were neighbors and drove to the games together. Never spoke, hated each other's guts, yet they spent so much time in each other's company."

So Pappin got the goal, the money got the goal, the money and the pool. Stemkowski felt something though. "I thought I felt a twinge. It could have been Harper kicking me or whatever. But the puck changed directions from the corner in front, dang it was in the net. And the referee skated over to the scorer's table and said give it to Stemkowski.

"They made the announcement and Pappin gave me a little nudge in the ribs and says did you really touch that puck? I got 10 grand riding on it, so would you please kindly say you didn't?"

"In those days we used to steal goals," Stemkowski explained. "I had a deal with Dale Rolfe when we were with the Rangers. Anything close in front of the net, he didn't have a bonus, he was a defenseman. I used to have a bonus for goals. There were deals in those days between forwards and defensemen.

"But it's Pappin's goal. Let him have it. He's in the books and what did I get out of it? A handshake, a thank you and a swim in a swimming pool."

Oh yeah, and a Stanley Cup.

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Dignified And Proud - Celebrating the 1967 Maple Leafs - Part 3



























For a die-hard hockey fan, who is not a Maple Leafs fan, I must say that I was more than impressed with tonight's ceremony honouring the greats of the legendary '67 team.

It was well done, tasteful, and to the point. Without being pompous, the ceremony was touching and honest. Watching it, you would hardly know that the team had not achieved the same goal in the last 40 years.



























The team that was once referred to as the "Over The Hill Gang" seemed genuinly pleased to be in each other's company at center ice.

Johnny Bower is 82 and Dave Keon is 66. In both their eyes I saw something that told me that they had been waiting a long time for a moment such as this. I was happy for them, and happy for the Leaf Nation multitudes that shared in it. The loyalty of the teams supporters need nights such as these to reafirm their belief in the team doing things properly. Tonight was a great first step.

























Watching the heroes of '67 walk out on the carpet tonight brought back to mind a post I read by Wardo at Leaf Club months ago.Wardo is an absolutely perceptive and knowledgable writer, and can nail an an emotion or a subject with insight few others can match. He blogs rarely, which is a bit of a shame for readers. Surely it translates into him hopefully being a busier life form away from the keyboard.



























His post entitled "Retiring Numbers" was a pointed and concise debate on whether numbers should be retired or honoured in the Leafs fashion. I didn't agree with his post, but was simply floored by how well it was written and how perfectly he put the reader inside the player's jersey. It remains one of the best things I have read online.

It starts this way:

"At the end of the red carpet stands a man. A spotlight cuts a circle for him in the big dark, a place in the arena all to himself, symbolic of the singular honour to be bestowed upon him. His hair has silvered, and the crows-feet around his eyes will soon outnumber the battle scars he won in glorious confrontation, the reminders that he once sacrificed every measure of himself to become one of the best, and the proof that the time he borrowed from the game lasted longer than for most."























"Across his back droops his uniform, not filled now by broad slabs of heroic equipment, but by his narrowing shoulders, his folded surname barely visible amid the billowing fabric. Above him, a standard is cranking to the rafters; a banner, crested with his name and number. It finishes its ascent beside the row of others, the long line of heroes from whom he accepted the torch, the storied past from which he drew his inspiration and strength to carry his teammates to glories of their own. He always understood the great responsibility that was his, and he is proud to have held up his end of the bargain."

"Always so emotionally contained as a player, his lips quiver, and he widens his eyes in a vain attempt to preserve his manhood, but his feelings betray him at last. Twin streams run from his eyes, cutting a path through his cracking features and twisted roots of ancient stitches to drop to the ice."

Like I said, Wardo nailed it dead on. This is Dave Keon`s moment, George Armstrong's day of recognition, Johnny Bower's final goodbye, all waiting in the hands of Maple Leafs management.

Here's hoping they continue to do the right things.

View the entire May 2, 1967 game at Google's NHL Video's.

The Toronto Maple Leafs.com site has some great content on the evening. In addition to the photo's included in this post, there are several pieces of note. Check these out.

Tonight's ceremony.

How and why Leafs are honoured.

Team history for all era's.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Celebrating The 1967 Toronto Maple Leafs - Part 2




















Tonight's the big night for members of the 1967 Stanley Cup Champions Maple Leafs, who are being honoured before tonight's matchup with the the Edmonton Oilers.

Too bad it wasn't fittingly celebrated with the Habs in town!



















There is some speculation that Matt Stajan may take it upon himself to honour Leaf great and former captain Dave Keon by removing his number 14 jersey along the course of celebrations. While MLSE has a jersey honouring policy only, comments bt team president Richard Peddie stated unequivocally that no hasty ceremony in regards to Keon's number has been planned.

It is the wish of many Leafs fans to see the team retire jerseys rather than honour them. Keon would be a great place to start!



























I'm quite pleased to see talk of this, as I'd mentioned of few days back that Stajan ought to do just such a thing. Joe at Legends, who has the '67 Leafs covered from Armstrong to Walton, also agrees.

All taken together, it should be a most memorable night for Leaf Nation as MLSE has appeared to finally be setting about getting things right with their oldtimers. It has surely made this Habs fan take note - up my respect for the organization a few notches.























In my previous post, "Celebrating The 1967 Maple Leafs", I've added a huge cluster of link to articles on the internet and in media that cover almost every aspect of the 1967 team. There are also profiles of each team member, courtesy of the aforementioned Legends Of Hockey Network. Scanning through today's available resources, I've added to this post a dozen more that I found deeper and more interesting that the previous ones. There is lots of focus on Keon, are all in my opinion, must reads. Check 'em out!





















I am planning two more posts in the coming days on this legendary team. One will be an examination on how the team was dismantled, where those players went, and who arrived in return. Another post will be slightly more ambitious - I'm planning to upload the entire pre-game celebration, perhaps in three or four parts, to the site. It'll be tricky, but worthwhile I am sure. I might even check out some YouTube clips to see if they have anything pertinent from 1967.

Keep checking back for more updates from forty years ago.

From the Sporting News, Canadian Press, Stajan Would Give Up 14 To Honour Keon

From Sun Media, No Surprises For # 14, by Lance Hornby

From Slam Sports, A Tale Of Unrequited Love, by Steve Simmons

From Metro News, Keon Happy To Be Part Of '67 Honours




























From the Ottawa Sun, A Restless Leaf Nation Relives The Glory Of '67 by Wayne Scanlan

From the Tornto Star, '67 Redux by Paul Hunter



















From the Globe And Mail, Fans Finally get A Chance To Show Keon Their Love by Dave Shoalts

From the Edmonton Sun, Turning Over a New Leaf by Terry Jones



















From Sun Media, The Forgotten Men Of '67 by Lance Hornby

From Sun Media, It All Went Downhill After Cup by Lance Hornby


























From the Hamilton Spectator, Forty Years by Neil Stevens

From the National Post, Larry Jeffrey - A Crutch Player by Joe O'Connor

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Celebrating the 1967 Maple Leafs





















(NOTE - Mired in my own teams 5 game losing streak / freefall, I have not jumped the bandwagon, rest assured. This post on the arch rival Maple Leafs is included on this blog purely because it is a compelling story.)

In 1967, I was barely five years old. I possibly knew what a puck and hockey stick were, had heard the name Bobby Orr, and could name two or three NHL hockey teams. The game captivated me around the ages of seven, eight, and nine, never to let go.

I remember Canada`s Centennial Year. Celebrations were everywhere and there was plenty of talk about Expo `67 and something called Man And His World.


Dave Keon,
Conn Smythe Trophy Winner















Growing up a hockey fan soon there after, I heard many forgotten tales of a Montreal Canadiens and Toronto Maple Leafs rivalry that never did materialize in my lifetime. Hearing my father`s stories, I longed to experience it, hardly realizing the Original Six era was done with, and that game would never be quite the same.

Kids in my day, around these parts, seemed to be either Habs fans or Bruins fans, with a sprinkling of Leaf supporters that were becoming a quieter bunch by the year. On TV, there were the Canadiens and Maple Leafs. The Canadiens won Stanley Cups while the Maple Leafs floundered for reasons I did not fully understand then. I made my choice easily.

Frank Mahovlich


















I could never exactly explain why, and still can`t, but resentment grew towards the Leafs. Perhaps I subconsciously disliked them for not showing up with great post seasons at the time. I always wanted to live those battles my father spoke so fondly of.

But enough about me and my Habs fan perspective. Suffice to say that I hated hating the Leafs. They seemed to never do anything right. When they finally did, in the 1990`s, I sensed a notion of the atmosphere that would permeate hockey fans Canada wide should the Leafs win or appear in the Stanley Cup final.


Punch Imlach and his famous blackboard message




















But enough about me and my Habs fan perspective. Suffice to say that I hated hating the Leafs. They seemed to never do anything right. When they finally did, in the 1990`s, I sensed a notion of the atmosphere that would permeate hockey fans Canada wide should the Leafs win or appear in the Stanley Cup final.

I must say, I never felt more alive than I did in the spring of 1993. Imagine being thrilled and ultimately disapointed all at once!


Allan Stanley
















On Saturday, the Maple Leafs will be honouring its last championship, the 1967 Cup winning team. It is a 40th anniversary of sorts, but more importantly, it is being seen as a bonding with past greatness, and perhaps the mending of fences from days gone awry.

Even the most die-hard of Leaf Nation subscribers has to admit that many things in the past 40 hockey seasons could have been managed much better. Hopefully, in the near future, Leafs organizations will be more aware of their fans committment to the team. Maybe they will pay more attention to their history, regardless of missteps. Maybe former players will be held in higher regard, despite not bringing home a Stanley Cup. Maybe they will be celebrated for their spirit of competition, their accomplishments, and their giving of themselves to an ever more demanding hockey public.



Terry Sawchuk














I say this without sarcasm, but if the Leafs want to be considered Canada's team, act like it. Over the past 40 years, they simply have not.

Wouldn't it be great for fans of the team, to see former players such as Wendel Clark, Paul Henderson, Dave Keon, and Felix Potvin, but to name a random few, partake in team functions, be it as simple as dropping the puck at a ceremonial faceoff on a particular night.


Eddie Shack


My wish for Leafs fan and former players revolves around the famous Ray Bourque / Phil Esposito moment in Boston years ago. I wish to see Matt Stajan go up to Dave Keon, and remove his jersey to reveal a new sweater number. I wish to see Mike Peca and Andrew Raycroft follow suit.

Is this asking too much?

General Manager John Ferguson Jr., whose father was a great player among Montreal Canadiens legends, could well appreciate such gestures.

All in time.

On the subject of Saturday's ceremony, many a good piece has been written. What I have been able to find are listed below, and I will add to them as they come in. There should be plenty!

Joe Pelletier at Legends Of Hockey has ambitiously been updating his Maple Leafs legends to include all member of the "Over The Hill Gang" from '67. You can read each players profile by clicking on their names, or simply scoot over to Joe's site and lose yourself for a few hours. Just tell the wife you're going to get some bread and milk!

From the Toronto Sun, View From The Ice by Dick Duff and Johnny Bower (Must Read!)

Globe And Mail.com, Telecast Of Maple Leafs Cup Win Holds Up Well by William Houston

From the Vancouver Sun, Original Six Largely Left In The Ditch by Cam Cole

From the Toronto Sun, Keon's Leaf's Homecoming Still Tastes Bitter by Steve Simmons

From NHL.com, Leafs Set To Celebrate The End Of An Era by James Murphy

From the Ottawa Sun, '67 Leafs - One For The Ages by Lance Hornby

From The Toronto Sun, The Punch Line: Celebrating the 1967 Leafs by George Gross

From the National Post, January 17, 2007, A Matter Of Honour by Joe O'Connor

From the Toronto Star, '67 Leafs: We Had A Shot At More Cups by Kevin McGran

From Simcoe.com, Ellis Happy To See Keon Back In Fold by Jim Barber

From CBCsports.com, Keon Set To Return To Toronto by Scotty Morrison

From Toronto Maple Leafs.com, A Chance To Say Thanks... by John Ferguson Jr.

From Toronto Maple Leafs.com, The Chief Looks Back At '67 by Mike Ullmer

From the Hockey Hall Of Fame, the 1967 Stanley Cup Champions

For an abundance of Leafs history and information, visit this Wiki link

For an overview of the entire 1967 hockey season, Wiki has it covered here

Members of the '67 Leafs are:

George Armstrong: Longest serving captain in Leafs history wins fourth Stanley Cup.

Bobby Baun: Saw little action in the final and did not attend parade out of pride.

Johnny Bower: At 42, the oldest goalie to win a Cup. Allowed only 3 goals in 3 games of final.

Brian Conacher: Scored 2 goals to eliminate Chicago and join uncles Roy and Lionel also on the Cup.

Kent Douglas: Did not appear in playoffs for the Leafs.

Ron Ellis: Scored first goal in finals deciding game.

Aut Erickson: Appeared in game 1 only, serving a TMM penalty.

Larry Hillman: Claimed from Boston in 1960 intra-league draft, won 2 more Cups with Montreal.

Tim Horton: Birth name is Miles G. Horton, but mother liked calling him Tim. Milesbits, anyone?

Larry Jeffrey: Played every minute of semi-finals but did not play against Montreal.

Dave Keon: "Turn the Keon" was a familiar chant in '67.

Red Kelly: Last of his 8 Cups, retired to coach the Los Angeles Kings.

Frank Mahovlich: Had his worst season in Toronto and was dealt to Detroit the following year.

Milan Marcetta: Appeared in only 3 playoff games for the Leafs.

Jim Pappin: Led post season scoring with 15 points, including 4 goals against Montreal.

Marcel Pronovost: Was motivated by a remark from the Canadiens predicting a Cup win.

Bob Pulford: Won 4 Cups with the Leafs. Scored OT winner at 28:26 in game 3.

Terry Sawchuk: Went 2-2 in finals with 12 goals against.

Eddie Shack: After a 26 goal season, went scoreless in final.

Allan Stanley: Played 10 seasons with the Leafs.

Pete Stemkowski: First "K" in surname is engraved backwards on the Cup.

Mike Walton: Like Mahovlich and Pappin, was one of Imlach's whipping boys.

Other players dressing for the Maple Leafs in 1967 but not appearing in the playoffs or named on the Stanley Cup were John Brenneman, Wayne Carleton, Bruce Gamble, Dick Gamble, Brent Imlach, Jim McKenny, Duane Rupp, Brit Selby, Al Smith and Gary Smith.

Non players named on the Stanley Cup are:

Punch Imlach, coach and general manager.
King Clancy: Won first Cup with Ottawa in 1923 and last this season as assistant coach.
Stafford Smythe, son of Conn Smythe, and one of the teams three owners.
Harold Ballard, president and owner.
John Bassett, chairman of the board and owner.
Bob Davidson, scout.
John Anderson, publicity.
Bob Haggert, trainer.
Tommy Naylor, assistant trainer
Karl Elieff, physiotherapist
Richard Smythe, mascot